The Cosmic Computer: digital manipulation of matter, space and time by Mohamed Ali Haj Yousef

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you dear Satyavarapu for the comment and suggestions with the links.

I will read further the links you provided, however single reports are not enough to make a theory that contradict an already established theory, that is the theory of relativity which is based on the invariance and constancy of the speed of light.

Moreover, I am not defending the speed of light itself as much as the cosmological speed limit, though they look the same so far, but what I mean is that if there was no cosmological speed limit we should be able to observe arbitrary high speeds that could several hundreds or thousands or much higher than the speed of light.

So in the end we clearly have a speed limit, and there is no model that could explain this apart from the Single Monad Model, or the continuous creation of space.

But anyway I thank you again for the links which I will look at later today as I am travelling now.

Best Regards

Mohamed

Branko Zivlak

Dear Mr. Yousef,

I am satisfied with the your response to me and the other participants. Your: speed jumps from 0 to c, agrees with Boskovic's curves. So that function is broken. It should therefore be very careful when using the integral and differential (see articles of Temur Kalanov). My personal opinion; the reason for the existence of Big Bang Theory is a misunderstanding of mathematics.

Regards,

Branko

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank Dear Branko for your positive comment:

You are completely right about mathematics.

Mathematicians usually start their theories by saying: "Let us suppose ..." and they build up on their suppositions which work nicely in all practical situations, but not in extreme theoretical situations.

Analysis, for example is based on the concept of limits which presupposes infinitesimal changes, which is impossible in nature because it implies infinities. In the end it might work as a kind of approximation, but cannot be used to describe the reality.

You are right: the reason for the existence of Big Bang Theory is a misunderstanding of mathematics.

Thank you for suggesting the articles of Temur Kalanov. I will have a look.

I appreciate it if you do rate my article.

Best Regards

Mohamed

Janice Murin

Einstein says: "If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it." After several readings I think I am starting to grasp the meaning of the inner time, but it is still unbelievable.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you Janice, I like your quote of Einstein: "If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it." An you are right, the idea is really absurd even to me: how can all this physical multiplicity, all the stars and galaxies are being made from one single metaphysical monad every instance of time!

I proposed this model in 2005, and only after inventing the concept of the duality of time and applying it to Relativity and mass-energy equivalence, and I found that id does solve most, if not all major physics problems, only after that I am starting to take it seriously.

I don't think people will take this model seriously very soon, it is really crazy. We spend so much time and money searching for the truth and when we find it we deny it.

Muder Moldier

All great ideas start crazy and look absurd in the beginning.

Muder Moldier

Dear Dr. Yousef;

Your model explains how "space" is created in "time", but what about matter particles, since you also say in the title that they are also manipulated?

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Muder;

I thank you again for asking this question.

Honestly I don't have a clear idea how matter is dynamically created with space in the inner dimensions of time, but my impression is that the difference between matter and space is that "space" is the simplest form of matter, you can say it is "flat matter" and "matter" is condensed or curved space. I believe that this will agree with general relativity which confirmed that matter causes the curvature of space, and will potentially solve the problem of dark matter and dark energy.

As I said in one previous comment that the SMM model brings back the concept of aether and quintessence in a novel way that does not require it to affect the speed of light or matter particles, since it is now the background space itself, and not something in the background.

Best Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear friends;

I would like to share with you this video presentation by prof. Haider Khan. His discussion in this short video is right into the point of what I am trying to show of the relation between time, space, and matter, which is based on Ibn Arabi-Time and Cosmology and he puts it in the context of the theory of relativity.

Best Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

I am sorry the link was broken, here again I hope it will work:

I would like to share with you this video presentation by prof. Haider Khan. His discussion in this short video is right into the point of what I am trying to show of the relation between time, space, and matter, which is based on [link:www.amazon.com/Mohamed-Haj-Yousef/e/B001JS2LC2"> Ibn Arabi-Time and Cosmology[/link] and he puts it in the context of the theory of relativity.

Muder Moldier

Thank you Dr. Yousef; I always thought that super-strings is the scientific version of the "science of letters" which I also think it is related to they philosophical theory of Pythagoras.

Janice Murin

Thank you for posting this video, it is very nice.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

you are welcome!

Janice Murin

Your theory is interesting but it is very complicated, maybe it is a good idea if you make some videos describing it to interested people like us.

Janice Murin

Dear Dr. Yousef;

So according to your model; is space and time discrete or continuous?

Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

In this model of continuous space construction, multiplicity is revealed through the inner level of time, and then evolves over the outer level. Although the reality of time in both levels is discrete, on the inner level, where space and matter are constructed, space will appear potentially continuous due to the vast possible manifestations that spread over the three outward dimensions and any other inward curled dimensions. Eventually, the ultimate structure of space could be discrete below the Planck distance as it is commonly believed, though this is still an open question, but in my opinion it is not, because the potential possibilities are always infinite regardless of scale. The same could also be said about the outer level of time, which will also appear potentially continuous, and is expected to be discrete below the Planck time. The difference happens only when we make an observation or measurement, because the possibilities will be now confined and mostly the particle nature will be revealed. Even when waves are observed they are still confined in a region of space in which the field will take certain finite values each of which is inevitably represented by some confined particles or finite space points.

Janice Murin

thank you

Paulan Moldier

I believe that space is continuous, but time is discrete.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

According to the SMM, space is rigid time.

Munrid Qaraq

Dear Dr. Yousef;

I was very happy to come across your article.

It is really very interesting and I am enjoying the discussion.

I just scanned your replies, but I will study them carefully because I believe your model really solves many problems and answer many deep questions.

Meanwhile, can I ask you if this idea of the duality of time has ever been proposed before?

Many Thanks

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Munrid;

Thank you for your positive comments, and I am looking forward to answer your questions when you study the article and comments.

To answer your question above: As far as I am aware, the concept of the duality of time has never been proposed or discussed by anyone before.

However, if you think about it is equivalent to, but more realistic than, the inflation scenario by Alan Guth. The reason is that inflation leads to eternal inflation or infinite hypothetical multiverse. The duality of time, which is part of the Single Monad Model, solves all the problems solved by inflation because the cosmos is re-created, or inflated, from the single monad every instance of time.

Best Regards

Muder Moldier

>> ...the Single Monad Model solves all the problems solved by inflation because the cosmos is re-created, or inflated, from the single monad every instance of time.

Amazing, absolutely amazing. REALLY AMAZING! I believe this is Nobel prize model. I can see it very clearly. It is a matter of time.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you Muder, I will share it with you!

Munrid Qaraq

I completely agree with Muder, it is the first time I see a model so simple and could solve many major problems so easily.

Paulan Moldier

This essay deserve the first prize for sure.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you Paulan.

« Previous Page Next Page »